Right Wing Nut House presents its readers with an articulate, if somewhat biased, defense of cats in the ongoing feud between dog and cat lovers. The author, Rick Moran, gamely counters John Hawkins' argument presented in PJ Media against feline superiority.
Moran categorically rejects Hawkin's position of canine superiority with thoughtful humor and underlying seriousness. Hawkins' alleged bias against cats read clearly through the satire of his original piece, spurring Moran's witty response. Through humorous insinuations, the author suggests that those who express an aversion to cats are, in fact, merely those who haven't been 'chosen' by a cat as a suitable companion.
Moran brings forward the unique qualities of felines, including their selective companionship - a departure from the often undiscriminating loyalty of dogs. He claims this selective nature, rather than being a disadvantage, as Hawkins suggests, is instead proof of a cat's discernment.
The author is resolute in his arguments, but one might wonder at his occasional tendency to offend dog lovers, painting them as animals lacking in discernment. This detracts from his objectivity, which is essential in any discussion where personal preferences vary greatly.
In the concluding lines, Moran levels a poignant accusation against canine ancestry. He provocatively refers to dogs as 'failed wolves', highlighting their historical relationship with their more ferocious relatives. However, this provocative statement seems to serve as a reflection of Moran's own biases rather than strictly factual information.
Overall, Right Wing Nut House presents an engaging piece of writing one that gives cat lovers much to agree with and dog lovers much to dispute. It stirs the age-old debate between cat and dog supporters with a fresh, intriguing perspective. Readers may find themselves intrigued and curious, even if they disagree with Moran's arguments. Despite occasional lapses into bias, the article presents a wonderfully contentious delve into the world of pet lovers.
