The user experience in question leaves a lot to be desired, with the initial interaction being a redirecting process. This is an unwelcome surprise for those expecting immediate access to content, instead being greeted with a transition phase. This can tend to be rather off-putting as it interrupts the user's desire for seamless, instantly gratifying user experience.
Moreover, the requirement for Javascript activation suggests an additional barrier to access content. For users who might not be technologically inclined or simply do not want to change their browser's settings, this can be a significant annoyance. It necessitates extra work on the user's part before they can even start what they came to do. This can increase the abandonment rate as the visitors do not want to, or do not know how to enable javascript on their browsers.
However, from a security viewpoint, requiring Javascript activation is not entirely a negative. It might add an additional layer of protection against potential cyber threats, preventing the execution of malicious scripts. But again, this should be communicated clearly and effectively to the user, without which, it might cause more confusion than assurance.
In conclusion, the browsing experience is met with a notable inconvenience due to the redirecting process and the Javascript requirement. It is vital that the administrators consider the diversity of their audience's technological know-how and cater to the lowest common denominator. While security measures such as Javascript activation are important, they should be implemented in a manner that is as non-invasive as possible. These issues, if addressed properly, can significantly improve the user experience and make the browsing process more straightforward and user-friendly. Overall, some fine-tuning and clear communication could go a long way in augmenting user satisfaction.
